Input:

Results:

Why Use This AI Detector?

This AI detector is free, unlimited, and fully privacy-protected—your text is never stored, saved, or reused. With transparent scoring, clear explanations, and minimal false positives, it’s designed to give you accurate, trustworthy insights every time you check your work.

How Does an AI Detector Work?

  • Perplexity: How predictable the text is
  • Burstiness: Variation in sentence patterns
  • Probability modeling: How closely the text matches typical AI patterns

In simple terms:
An AI detector looks for writing that is too uniform, too predictable, or structurally similar to known AI outputs.

Use an AI detector when:

  • You’ve used AI tools to brainstorm or outline and want to ensure your final writing is original
  • You’re an educator verifying the authenticity of student work
  • You’re submitting academic work and want a safety check
  • You’re producing content for clients who require human-written text

When Should I Not Use an AI Detector?

Avoid using an AI detector when:

  • You’re analyzing highly technical or formulaic writing (it may be flagged unfairly)
  • You’re evaluating extremely short text like headlines or social media captions
  • You need 100% accuracy—because no AI detector can guarantee it
  • The text contains quotes, citations, or structured academic sections

These situations often trigger false positives due to predictable patterns.

AI Detectors vs. Plagiarism Checkers: What’s the Difference?

Tool Type
What It Detects

Purpose

AI Detector

Whether text appears AI-generated

Authorship verification

Plagiarism Checker

Matches to existing sources

Originality verification

How Accurate Are AI Detectors?

  • The length of the text
  • The writing style
  • The detector’s underlying algorithm
  • The AI model that may have generated the text

My Text Was Flagged Incorrectly as AI. What Should I Do?

AI detectors are useful, but they’re not flawless—and even fully human-written text can sometimes be misidentified as AI. If your work is flagged incorrectly, there are practical steps you can take to demonstrate authorship, fix false positives, and address the situation confidently. Many institutions accept revision history or earlier drafts as proof of human writing. Here’s how to respond:

How Universities Handle AI Detector Scores and AI Use?

As AI tools become more common in academic writing, universities are developing clearer policies on how to evaluate AI detector scores and how students may—and may not—use AI tools. While approaches vary, most institutions follow similar principles. Most universities treat AI detector scores as advisory, not definitive. No reputable institution punishes a student solely on the basis of an AI score.

Universities & instructors typically

  • Review the student’s writing process
  • Compare the style to previous work
  • Request drafts or explanations
  • Use AI scores as one piece of evidence, not the entire case

Policies are evolving, but AI detectors alone cannot prove misconduct.

Current University Rules on AI Use

  • AI tools may be used only if acknowledged
  • AI-generated writing cannot be submitted as your own
  • Students must maintain authorship and academic integrity
  • AI use must be disclosed in the methodology or acknowledgements

Some institutions allow AI for brainstorming, editing, or grammar correction—but not for generating full assignments.

Why AI Detectors Differ — and Why None Are 100% Accurate

AI detectors are not 100% accurate because:

  • Human writing sometimes resembles AI patterns
  • AI writing can sound extremely human
  • Detection is probability-based, not certainty-based
  • New AI models evolve faster than detectors

AI detection = an educated guess, not a final verdict.

Why AI Detectors Give Different Results

  • Different algorithms
  • Different training datasets
  • Different interpretations of perplexity
  • Different weighting of sentence features

This is why one tool may say “80% human” while another flags the same text as AI-generated.

Frequently Asked Questions About AI Detectors

An AI detector analyzes text to estimate whether it was written by a human or generated by an AI system like ChatGPT.

They are helpful but not perfectly reliable. Most operate in the 60–85% accuracy range, depending on text length, style, and the AI model used.

Each AI detector uses its own algorithms, training data, and interpretation of writing patterns. One tool may rate your text as human while another flags it as AI-generated.

Use it before submitting academic or professional work, when checking for overuse of AI assistance, or when verifying the authenticity of text you’re reviewing.

Revise flagged sections, add personal detail, use varied sentence structures, and consider running the text through a humanizer tool. Save drafts as proof of authorship.

AI detectors work best on text over 150–200 words. Short passages often produce false results.

Universities use AI scores as guidance, not evidence of misconduct. They also review drafts, writing style, and the student’s writing history.

AI detectors examine patterns such as perplexity, burstiness, sentence structure, and predictability to determine whether writing resembles typical AI output.

Academic writing is formal, structured, and predictable—qualities that AI detectors often mistake for AI-generated patterns, leading to false positives.

No. AI detectors rely on probability, not certainty. Human writing can resemble AI, and AI writing can imitate human style.

Avoid using detectors for very short text, highly technical writing, quoted material, or formulaic content—they often produce inaccurate results.

Choose detectors with transparent scoring, low false-positive rates, and regularly updated models. Tools like FinalScanPro, Ref-n-write, and Copyleaks are widely trusted.

Most institutions allow AI for brainstorming or editing but prohibit submitting AI-generated writing as your own. AI use must be acknowledged and cited when required.

False positives happen when writing is highly structured, formal, or lacks personal variation. Academic tone is particularly prone to being flagged.